Positive Reinforcement vs.
Punishment in Coaching:
What the Research Actually Says

Home » Positive Reinforcement vs.Punishment in Coaching:What the Research Actually Says

Recently this fall sports season, I noticed something that’s been gnawing at me as a coach, professor, and sport leader: punishment in sports. I’ve watched two NCAA Division I programs, one in football and one in soccer, run their players after games as punishment. Fans were still in the stands. Cameras were rolling. The athletes were being “disciplined” publicly. It made me wonder: Does this even work?

If you’ve seen the movie Miracle, you probably remember Herb Brooks skating his team after a poor performance. Hollywood frames it as a moment that forged champions. But real life doesn’t always work like that. Let’s look at what research says about punishment, motivation, and athlete performance and how we can make discipline actually effective.

Reinforcement vs. Punishment: What Are We Really Doing?

At its core, punishment is about decreasing a certain behavior. Reinforcement is about increasing it. Coaches blend both, but the research is clear: 80–90% of our communication should be positive reinforcement. Athletes perform best when they feel supported, not scared.

Legendary coach Pat Summitt understood this balance. She told her players to track how many positive vs. negative things she said to them. At the end of practice, players would always have more “points” in the positive column than negative. Even tough coaches can build trust when positive reinforcement outweighs criticism.

Why Running Players After Games Backfires

Physical punishment might feel satisfying in the moment. A “teachable” moment to show you’re in charge. But studies in sports psychology and self-determination theory show coercive environments erode intrinsic motivation, increase anxiety, and create a fear of failure. Instead of building toughness, you risk creating resentment, learned helplessness, and even dropout from sport.

And perhaps most damaging, you risk associating physical activity with failure, especially for young athletes. We want kids to love sports so they’ll stay active for life. Punishment that feels like humiliation works against that.

What Makes Punishment Effective?

Punishment can work if it’s:

  • Consistent (same infraction, same response)
  • Behavior-focused (address the behavior, not the person)
  • Private (avoid public shaming or sarcasm)
  • Age-appropriate (emphasize learning and responsibility, not fear)
Involve athletes in setting team standards and consequences. Give them ownership of the process. This taps into autonomy support, one of the key drivers of motivation, and makes rules feel fair.

Feedback as “Instructional Punishment”

When mistakes happen in practices or games, don’t just point them out. Teach the solution. Ask athletes questions to spark self-awareness:
  • “Why did you go left when the play was designed to go right?”
  • “What could you do differently next time?”
When teaching a new skill or strategy, I have created the “Explain, Example, Explore” approach. It allows players to fail, reflect, and self-correct. Explain = teach what you want done. Example = show your players how to do it. Explore = let your players try and be free to fail until they master the skill. It’s harder work for coaches than just yelling or running sprints but it leads to learning.

When Players Are Openly Defiant

What about the player who isn’t just making mistakes but openly defies instructions or sabotages the team? Running them won’t fix it. It usually just fuels the fire.Instead:
  • Start with a private conversation. Create space for honest dialogue. “What’s going on?” is more productive than “Why did you do that?”
  • Use natural consequences, not power plays. Missed playing time, leadership roles, or other earned privileges can be powerful motivators.
  • Encourage peer accountability. Sometimes the message lands best when it comes from teammates, not coaches.
  • Exit as a last resort. If the behavior continues, it may be time to separate, but always preserve the athlete’s dignity.
Research on disruptive behaviors shows they often stem from unmet needs: autonomy, competence, or relatedness. Aggressive or defiant behavior can also arise from ego threat or feeling undervalued in the group. Address the root cause before imposing consequences.

Shifting from Reactive Punishment to Proactive Leadership

Punishment might control short-term behavior, but it hinders long-term growth. Our goal as coaches isn’t compliance, it’s development. That means shaping behavior, maximizing active learning time, and creating a culture that values effort, accountability, and teaching over fear.
Running players after games may feel like coaching. But it’s not teaching. And if we’re not teaching, we’re not helping them grow.

The Takeaway for Coaches

  • Lead with positive reinforcement. 80–90% of communication should be constructive.
  • Punish behaviors, not people.
  • Use feedback to teach, not humiliate.
  • Address defiance with dialogue, natural consequences, and dignity.
  • Build a culture where athletes understand their roles, feel valued, and buy into team standards.
It’s harder work than blowing a whistle and saying “Run.” But it’s the kind of hard work that creates better athletes and better people.
Back to News & Media